<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>BlackBerry Cool Staging - Latest Comments in BlackBerry Storm reviews surface</title><link>http://bbcoolstaging.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://bbcoolstaging.disqus.com/blackberry_storm_reviews_surface/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:25:50 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: BlackBerry Storm reviews surface</title><link>http://blackberrycool.smokelabs.net/2008/11/blackberry-storm-reviews-surface/#comment-13692637</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here is another Storm review:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mobiletechreview.com/phones/BlackBerry-Storm.htm" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.mobiletechreview.com/phones/BlackBerry-Storm.htm"&gt;http://www.mobiletechreview...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">M. El</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:25:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BlackBerry Storm reviews surface</title><link>http://blackberrycool.smokelabs.net/2008/11/blackberry-storm-reviews-surface/#comment-13692636</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, thats a thrashing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The crunchgear review was worthless, but engadget and bgr did a great job and really covered all the details.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I was really pulling for the storm, and I was on the fence about the "clickable" screen, but it looks like they dropped the ball.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Guess that means I need to consider the iphone again (which I'm open to), or the bold?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">evbart</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:44:04 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>